Family sues CA professionals for encouraging crossdressing student while MA passes bill promoting crossdressing

Is Massachusetts’s transgender/cross-dressing bill dangerous?  Ask Larry King’s family.

A California lawsuit claims the school and social worker failed to tone down the flamboyant behavior of 15-year-old Larry King who was killed by fellow student Brandon McInerney while at school.  Now 17, McInerny pleaded guilty this week to second-degree murder. 

McInerny’s attorneys claim he “had reached an emotional breaking point after King made repeated, unwanted sexual advances toward him and other boys.”  The Huffington Post reports:

"In the weeks leading up to the shooting, school administrators allowed King to wear heels and makeup because federal law provides the right of students to express their sexual orientation."

After the tragic killing, King’s family sued several agencies for failing to tone down the boy’s “flamboyant behavior.”

"King's family has settled a wrongful death lawsuit against the school district, McInerney, a gay rights organization, a shelter and others. The suit claimed that everyone from King's teacher to his social worker failed to urge the effeminate teen to tone down flamboyant behavior."

Meanwhile, back on the east coast, Massachusetts promotes flamboyant behavior by passing a bill protecting transgender and cross-dressing individuals.

So what’s it going to be folks?  How do we prevent more tragedies like the shooting of Larry King in school?

Should we encourage cross-dressing or sue the folks who promote it?

Archie Comics promote gender-segregation in marriage

Are comic books the newest method of indoctrinating kids to the homosexual agenda?

Archie Comics plans to promote gender-segregated marriage in their upcoming January issue.  The Huffington Post shows the cover illustration which features, “Kevin Keller, Riverdale's first openly gay character who is also an active U.S. military officer, tying the knot with his African-American partner, Clay Walker.”  

Gay rights activist Daniel Villarreal wrote, “I and a lot of other people want to indoctrinate, recruit, teach, and expose children to queer sexuality.”  “And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start f***ing men.”  

Archie Comics author Dan Parent defended the move to come out with gender segregation in marriage. 

"The world of Riverdale has to reflect contemporary culture and to show it is an accepting, diverse place. And that's why Kevin is important, to show that everybody is welcome in this all-American town we've embraced for over 70 years."

 Will Riverdale “reflect contemporary culture” by showing: 

• A woman fleeing the country with her biological child rather than give her up to her gay ex-partner?
• Heterosexuals fired for believing in gender-integrated marriage?
• Same-sex couples suing gender-integrated couples for a wedding reception?
• Catholic adoption agencies barred from federal funds for placing children only in homes with a mother and a father?
• Will children in Riverdale wonder "how two men do it”?

 Are you laughing yet?  

Aren’t comic books supposed to be funny?

Video: Donor conception in Starbuck no laughing matter

Medical research scientist Damian Adams criticizes the French-Canadian comedy Starbuck for making fun of donor conception. The show chronicles the life of David, a 42-year-old who acts like an “irresponsible adolescent.”  David’s girlfriend announces she’s pregnant and he discovers he has fathered 533 kids twenty years previous via sperm donation.  One hundred forty-two of his children want to know who their dad is; all they know is his pseudonym,  “Starbuck.”

Sounds funny, right?  But not all donor-conceived persons are amused:

 “As a society we do not find it funny when a child has been separated from either or both parents through happenstance. We recognise death or divorce to be immensely tragic. Yet intentional pre-conception separations are regarded as humorous.”

View Starbuck trailer:

Gender-segregated marriage low priority for Australia, 70% favor gender-integration

Sexton Marketing recently polled over 1200 Australians for the Ambrose Centre for Religious Liberty.  Among other findings they discovered that Australians are leery of rushing into gender segregated marriage without a clearer picture of the unintended consequences (for example, lawsuits and censoring.)  Almost 70% polled believe marriage between one man and one woman is vital to society and should be upheld.  

The Sydney Morning Herald reports:

Three out of four respondents, including a surprising majority of those in favour of same-sex marriage, believe that as a society we should try to ensure that children are raised by their natural mother and father and promote this norm.

The survey also shows that citizens consider same-sex marriage polarizing, low priority, and that the welfare of children must be taken into account.

In short, they want to slow down the push for gender-segregation in marriage:

Ordinary Australians seem to feel that this is a divisive issue, that there are more important issues to be dealt with, that the interests of children must be considered along with the rights of adults and that any hurried change has the potential for unintended and undesirable consequences - some of which strike at the heart of our free and open society.

Kissing men in Benetton Unhate ads produce Unshop results

Talk about in your face.  

Benetton’s "Unhate" ads featuring close up photos of world leaders smooching are too shocking for consumers.  The photoshopped pictures feature unlikely pairs kissing.  The liplocked include: 

• U.S. President Barack Obama and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez
• Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas
• North Korean leader Kim Jong II and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak
• Pope Benedict XVI and Sheik Ahmed el-Tayeb of Cairo’s al-Azhar Institute

There was a time when men kissed in greeting.  Kissing was so commonplace that Judas betrayed Christ with a kiss.  But in our oversexualized world of pornography and homosexual political rights, men kissing each other has a sexual connotation certainly not lost on the clothing company.

Et tu Benetton?

The United Colors of Benetton show their true colors:  anything for a buck. 

Benetton said the photographs of political and religious leaders kissing were 'symbolic images of reconciliation - with a touch of ironic hope and constructive provocation - to stimulate reflection on how politics, faith and ideas, when they are divergent and mutually opposed, must still lead to dialogue and mediation.'

Consumers aren't buying it.

Mediate this

Benetton’s kisses betrayed their true motive.  They revealed themselves as materialistic, manipulative, and inept.  Customers are not feeling the love.

“It shows a serious lack of respect for the Pope,” Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi said.  The Daily Mail noted “Al-Azhar suspended interfaith talks with the Vatican earlier this year after [Pope] Benedict called for greater protections for Egypt’s minority Christians.”

 At the Vatican’s request, Benetton pulled their ad featuring the Pope kissing Sheik Ahmed el-Tayeb.

Money talks, shock walks

Benetton stocks plummeted as customers reacted to the Unhate campaign with a strategy of their own:  Unshop.

Video: Republican candidates pledge support for gender-integrated marriage at Presidential Thanksgiving Forum

At the Thanksgiving forum in Iowa, Republicans Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, and Rick Santorum vowed to fight for gender-integrated marriage.  Ron Paul argued in favor of keeping government out of marriage entirely, thus allowing it to be directed by religious groups.

Video: Tamara Scott warns gender-segregated marriage leads to objective sexualism like marrying the Eiffel Tower

Michele Bachmann’s Iowa campaign chair Tamara Scott says she’s not making it up.  Redefining marriage leads not just to polygamy and polyamory, but also to objective sexualism.  She advises people to check out the woman with OS who “married” the Eiffel Tower. 

Sorry ladies, the Eiffel Tower is taken.  And a Huffington Post reader already called dibs on Michelangelo’s David.

As if men didn’t have enough competition.  To woo a lady nowadays they have to compete with other men, women, and now inanimate objects: 

Harassment of Christians continues despite liberal denial of abuse

In his op-ed piece in the LA Times, Michael Kinsley noted that Christians feel “oppressed.”  But he doesn’t understand the feeling because he flat out denies any suppression:

“If anyone is trying to oppress Christians, he or she is doing a pretty lousy job of it. Christians — believing Christians — are everywhere you look.”

 Kinsley mocks Christians for feeling bullied, and yet doesn’t understand why they feel bullied.  So he challenged Archbishop Charles Chaput to find evidence. 

Here it is:

·      A Vermont judge granted custody of Christian Lisa Miller's daughter to her ex-partner Janet Jenkins, even though she is not related to the child.

·      A NY couple sued the Catholic owners of the Wildflower Inn for not hosting a reception to celebrate their gender-segregated marriage.

·      True North Reports posted an article headlined:   “Judeo-Christian beliefs and values condemned by Burlington School Board.”

But that’s just a sample from Vermont.  There’s more nationwide. Not only are citizens being silenced and sued, the abuse is so prevalent that agencies are tracking it:

The Marriage Anti-Defamation Alliance reports stories of people who have lost jobs because of their religious beliefs.

The Heritage Foundation compiled a list of abuses perpetrated against people advocating for gender-integrated marriage: 

Supporters of Proposition 8 in California have been subjected to harassment, intimidation, vandalism, racial scapegoating, blacklisting, loss of employment, economic hardships, angry protests, violence, at least one death threat, and gross expressions of anti-religious bigotry.

 The National Organization for Marriage keeps current on abuses perpetrated by gender-segregated marriage activists.  For example, Occupy Wichita recently disrupted a meeting of 250 people learning about reducing poverty by strengthening marriage. 

For an example of a pro-lifer who lost her job due to her religious beliefs, check out Jill Stanek. 

If Kinsley really were interested in evidence, he could easily find it.  But rather than handle this scientifically, it looks like he’d rather enjoy his religious fantasy that there is no maltreatment of Christians in America.